Re: [Question] Window Function Results without ORDER BY Clause
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Question] Window Function Results without ORDER BY Clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1753098.1752249449@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Question] Window Function Results without ORDER BY Clause ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Question] Window Function Results without ORDER BY Clause
Re: [Question] Window Function Results without ORDER BY Clause |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Friday, July 11, 2025, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, are both result sets technically correct given the absence of an ORDER >> BY clause? > The system is behaving within the requirements of the specification. The > query itself is bugged code that the query author should fix. Well, it's our own regression-test query. I think the actual question being asked here is "do our regression tests need to pass under random non-default GUC settings?". I'd say no; it'd be next door to impossible to guarantee that. If this query gave unstable results in practice, we'd have noticed by now (it's been there since 2010). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: