Re: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
"Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us> writes:
>> I have a distinct sense of deja vu here.  I think this idea, or something
>> isomorphic to it, was previously discussed with some other syntax details.

> I found the old discussion I recalled having and Stephen had suggested using
> @extschema{'postgis'}@
> On this thread --
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160425232251.GR10850@tamriel.snowman.net
> Is that the one you remember?

Hmmm ... no, ISTM it was considerably more recent than that.
[ ...digs... ]  Here we go, it was in the discussion around
converting contrib SQL functions to new-style:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3395418.1618352794%40sss.pgh.pa.us

There are a few different ideas bandied around in there.
Personally I still like the @extschema:extensionname@
option the best, though.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Christensen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL
Следующее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Document parameter count limit