Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature
Дата
Msg-id 17498.1297097872@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Ответы Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> We could avoid the need for a per-row "system_data" flag if we required
> extensions to split user-editable and system-provided configuration data
> into different tables. For convenient access to the configuration data,
> the extension could let the user-editable table inherit from the 
> system-provided one, or use a view to combine the two.

Yeah, this is another approach that one could take instead of having
per-row flags.  I'm not sure that it's better, much less so much better
that we should force extensions to do it that way and not the other.
But it's definitely another argument against making a hard-wired
assumption that there will be a flag column.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Range Types