Re: Eh?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Eh? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17433.997799249@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Eh? (Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> writes:
> This makes me wonder... in the case of a stored complex view, would it be
> helpful to ask PostgreSQL to spend extra time in query optimisation and
> then cache the result? Or does it do this already?
I don't see any value in caching plans for views as such. The planner
considers each query as a whole, which it has to do for performance.
Example:create view v as select * from foo;select * from v where bar = 42;
If there's an index on foo.bar, you'd want this query to use it, no?
So the plan has to be formed on the basis of the actual query; there's
no way to pull out the part for a view.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: