Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Дата
Msg-id 173d47e1-3aad-5d59-c902-1715c3ce5bc1@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/7/17 8:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If FOUND were declared at an outer scoping level such that any
> user-created declaration overrode the name, then we could do likewise
> for other auto variables and not fear compatibility breaks.
>
> Currently, though, we don't seem to be quite there: it looks like
> FOUND is an outer variable with respect to DECLARE blocks, but it's
> more closely nested than parameter names.

Sorry, I'm not following... you can override a parameter name the same 
way and get the same behavior, no?

BTW, I do wish you could change the label of the scope that arguments 
went into, so that you could use that label to refer to function 
parameters. If we allowed that it'd perhaps be the best of both worlds: 
you'd be guaranteed access to all auto variables and parameters, and 
that access wouldn't need to be tied to the function name (which can be 
both painful and error prone).
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal