Re: Assertion failure in HEAD and 13 after calling COMMIT in a stored proc
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Assertion failure in HEAD and 13 after calling COMMIT in a stored proc |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1730209.1624373922@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Assertion failure in HEAD and 13 after calling COMMIT in a stored proc (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Assertion failure in HEAD and 13 after calling COMMIT in a stored proc
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 04:19:27PM -0700, Jim Nasby wrote:
>> The following generates an assertion failure.
> A bisect run points me to the following commit:
> commit 73b06cf893c9d3bb38c11878a12cc29407e78b6c
> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Date: Fri Nov 22 15:02:18 2019 -0500
> Avoid taking a new snapshot for an immutable simple expression in plpgsql.
Hmm. I think the real issue here is that commit 84f5c2908 did
not cover the "simple expression" code path in plpgsql. We
need to re-establish an outer snapshot when the next thing
that happens after COMMIT is a simple expression, too.
In this view, 73b06cf8 just removed code that was masking the
lack of a snapshot during the evaluation of the simple expr
itself. However, we'd still have had a problem if the simple
expr returned a toast pointer that we had to dereference after
returning (and popping that snapshot). So I'm thinking
back-patch to v11, as before.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: