Re: select ... into question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: select ... into question
Дата
Msg-id 17302.1051810331@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на select ... into question  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> our parser allows the into clause only between the target list and the
> from clause. While this is surely the was I usually use that clause,
> others dbms are different. Informix e.g. allows it also as the very last
> clause after the having clause.

> Is there a reason (standard?) why we don't allow that, or shall I go
> ahead and commit a parser change to allow this order?

SELECT INTO is so brain-damaged already that we should not enlarge the
scope of syntaxes it commandeers.  (People ought to be using CREATE
TABLE AS for this, IMHO.)
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Meskes
Дата:
Сообщение: select ... into question
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we SetQuerySnapshot() between actions of a rule?