Bruce Momjian said:
>
> OK, a few things. First, Tom has fixed snprintf.c so it should
> properly process positional parameters now. Would you first test the
> libintl version of *printf to see if it can process %$ parameters
> (probably by hacking up any language file and testing the printing),
> and then try your patch below to see if it is properly reorders the
> arguments. If libintl does not reorder properly, but our snprintf.c
> does, would you please generate an appliable patch we can put into
> 8.1.X? Thanks.
>
> I know I am asking a lot, but you are "the man" on this one. :-)
>
Since the effect of the configure change I am proposing to reverse was to
force use of the *printf in libintl, don't we already know the answer to
your first question from Nicolai's report?
cheers
andrew