Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser, |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17296.1111255686@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser, (Roy Badami <roy@gnomon.org.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Roy Badami <roy@gnomon.org.uk> writes:
> ie do you accept
> interval '1 day 1 hour' day to second
I think we have to, and the reason is that this isn't different under
the hood from reading the external value '1 day 1 hour' and storing
it into a column that has the DAY TO SECOND typmod. If we reject
the above we'd be breaking existing dump files. Furthermore this
would imply that dump output from a constrained interval column
would *have to* not have any decoration; ie we could only output
'1 1' and not '1 day 1 hour'. Regardless of what the spec says,
I find the former dangerously ambiguous.
I'm happy to see our code upgraded to accept the spec's syntax.
I won't be happy to see it changed to reject input that we used
to accept, especially when the only argument for doing so is a
narrow-minded insistence that we can't accept anything beyond
what the spec says.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: