Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 172.1236533768@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes? | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Another thought now though. What if someone updates the pg_index entry --
> since we never reset indcheckxmin then the new tuple will have a new xmin and
> will suddenly become invisible again for no reason.
Hmm ... if updates to pg_index entries were common then I could get
worried about that, but they really aren't.
> Couldn't this happen if you set a table WITHOUT CLUSTER for example? Or if
> --as possibly happened in the user's case-- you reindex the table and don't
> find any HOT update chains but the old pg_index entry had indcheckxmin set
> already?
This is all useless guesswork until we find out whether he was using
REINDEX or CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: