Re: pg_upgrade permission check
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade permission check |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17131.1305562235@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade permission check (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade permission check
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "full access permissions" seems unhelpfully vague. Why not say
>> "you must have both read and write access to the current directory"?
> OK, I can do that, but they need execute permission in that directory
> too to look up file names in there. Should I say execute too?
I doubt it's worth worrying about. man chdir saith
In order for a directory to become the current directory, a process must have execute (search) access to the
directory.
I'm not entirely certain what happens if you chdir into a directory and
then someone revokes the bit afterwards, but I do not feel a need to
complicate the error message to cover such a case.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: