Re: inline newNode()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: inline newNode() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17106.1034137712@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: inline newNode() (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: inline newNode()
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Right, palloc shouldn't. I was thinking of having another version of
> palloc that _does_ clear out memory, and calling that from a newNode()
> macro. We already know palloc is going to call MemoryContextAlloc, so
> we could have a pallocC() that calls a new MemoryContextAllocC() that
> would call the underlying memory allocation function, then do the loop
> like MemSet to clear it.
But if the MemSet is inside the called function then it cannot reduce
the if-tests to a compile-time decision to invoke the word-zeroing loop.
We want the MemSet to be expanded at the newNode call site, where the
size of the allocated memory is a compile-time constant.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: