Re: Renice on Postgresql process

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ben Chobot
Тема Re: Renice on Postgresql process
Дата
Msg-id 170D4F8E-77FC-4BAA-9A06-F80F1A564A62@silentmedia.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Renice on Postgresql process  ("Ayappan P2" <ayappap2@in.ibm.com>)
Ответы Re: Renice on Postgresql process  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
Список pgsql-general
On May 7, 2018, at 7:46 AM, Ayappan P2 <ayappap2@in.ibm.com> wrote:

Hi All,

We are using Postgresql in AIX. Unlike some other databases, Postgresql has lot of other process running in the background along with the main process.

We do "renice" only on the Postgres main process. Is it sufficient to have higher priority only for the main process or we have to do "renice" for all the Postgresql related process ( like wal writer, logger , checkpointer etc.,) ?


What do you hope to achieve with your renicing? There is a compelling school of thought which holds that nice database processes take longer to relinquish their resources, which doesn't end up helping anything at all.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Ayappan P2"
Дата:
Сообщение: Renice on Postgresql process
Следующее
От: "a"
Дата:
Сообщение: How to manipulate tuples in C functions?