pgindent vs try/catch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | pgindent vs try/catch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17028.1095010802@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: pgindent vs try/catch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm fairly displeased with what pgindent has done to single-line PG_TRY
constructs, as in this example from pl_exec.c:
*************** exec_stmt_block(PLpgSQL_execstate * esta
*** 911,922 **** SPI_result_code_string(xrc)); PG_TRY();
! {
! rc = exec_stmts(estate, block->body);
! } PG_CATCH(); {
! ErrorData *edata; PLpgSQL_exceptions *exceptions;
int j;
--- 912,921 ---- SPI_result_code_string(xrc)); PG_TRY();
! rc = exec_stmts(estate, block->body); PG_CATCH(); {
! ErrorData *edata; PLpgSQL_exceptions *exceptions;
int j;
*************** exec_stmt_block(PLpgSQL_execstate * esta
On the whole I'd prefer that pgindent not suppress "unnecessary"
brace pairs at all.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: