Re: moving from contrib to bin
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16970.1418435875@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: moving from contrib to bin (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: moving from contrib to bin
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 12/12/14 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think pg_upgrade should continue to have SQL scripts that create and
>> delete the SQL function definitions for these.
> That won't actually work very easily. LANGUAGE internal functions need
> to be in fmgr_builtins, and the only way to get them there is by listing
> them in pg_proc.h. (We could drop the functions in initdb, but seems
> kind of silly.)
Oh, good point.
> The functions do already check themselves that they are called in binary
> upgrade mode, so exposing them in pg_proc doesn't seem risky.
Fair enough ... binary upgrade mode is not readily accessible, right?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: