Re: Version number for pg_control
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Version number for pg_control |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16945.1468621343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Version number for pg_control (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Version number for pg_control
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> +1 for changing it. However, I don't think it's such a big deal since
> each version since 8.3 (at least) has had a unique catalog version.
> Maybe this would affect pg_controldata or other supporting utilities but
> the server itself should not be affected since it also checks the
> catalog version.
Right, that version number exists mostly for the benefit of pg_controldata
and allied utilities. You would get a CRC failure in any case when trying
to go between inconsistent notions of what pg_control contains, but the
version number is supposed to help you figure out why that happened.
As things stand, though, it'd only mislead you.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: