Re: BUG #6299: pg_dump, pg_dumpall - Problem with the order of backup functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #6299: pg_dump, pg_dumpall - Problem with the order of backup functions
Дата
Msg-id 16935.1321716868@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #6299: pg_dump, pg_dumpall - Problem with the order of backup functions  (lindebg <lindebg@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #6299: pg_dump, pg_dumpall - Problem with the order of backup functions  (lindebg <lindebg@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
lindebg <lindebg@gmail.com> writes:
> On 11/19/2011 12:19 AM, lindebg@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Thanks, in this case works :-) However, this does not solve all cases.
>>> Unlikely, but possible to create, cyclic case can not be restored:

Color me skeptical.  Under what conceivable use-case could you have
functions that were mutually dependent in that way?  And actually did
something useful (not recurse till stack overflow) when called?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: lindebg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #6299: pg_dump, pg_dumpall - Problem with the order of backup functions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #6301: extra space in psql variable expansion