Re: simplehash: tb->sizemask = 0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: simplehash: tb->sizemask = 0
Дата
Msg-id 16907.1511841221@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на simplehash: tb->sizemask = 0  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: simplehash: tb->sizemask = 0
Список pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I'm a bit puzzled by this code in SH_COMPUTE_PARAMETERS:

>     if (tb->size == SH_MAX_SIZE)
>         tb->sizemask = 0;
>     else
>         tb->sizemask = tb->size - 1;

> Doesn't that mean that with SH_MAX_SIZE we end up with sizemask being 0
> (i.e. no bits set)?

Yeah, which is very obviously broken: for one thing, the Asserts
in SH_NEXT/SH_PREV would surely go off.

(Why are those assertions, anyway, and not test-and-elog?
I do not think an assertion failure is a suitable way to
report "hash table full".)

> I don't think we're building hash tables with 2^32 buckets, though.

What this proves is that nobody has ever tested the behavior at
SH_MAX_SIZE.  I would suggest building a test version with that
set small enough to be conveniently reachable, and then exercising
the behavior as the limit is approached and reached.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the WindowFunctions