Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
		
	 
	| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include  | 
		
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16894.1293468896@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | 
        		Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include
  | 
		
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include  Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include  | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck
Ah, I'd forgotten that.
> What's missing is to automate this, but it's unclear in what context,
> and perhaps also to what extend this should be a hard requirement.
After a bit of experimentation, I can say that this is better than
Andrew's hack, but it's still a good distance shy of something that
should be automated or treated as a hard requirement.  The problem with
it is that it doesn't know anything about inclusion-order restrictions;
and to make matters worse, the actual order in which things are included
will vary for different users, because of the unspecified order in which
'find' will find things.
[ lightbulb ] ... although we could improve that quite a bit if we
processed each .h file separately instead of insisting on smashing
everything into one compilation.  Let me go try that.
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: