Re: index problems (again)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: index problems (again) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1685.1457369078@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: index problems (again) (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>) |
| Ответы |
Re: index problems (again)
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj> writes:
> But as far as I can see, apart from the absolute extremes, the
> index-only scan is _always_ going to be quicker than the index+table
> scan.
Well, that is a different issue: what does the planner think of an
index-only scan as compared to a regular index scan. I suspect that
it's pricing the IOS very high because a lot of the table is dirty
and therefore will have to be visited even in a nominally index-only
scan. You might check whether the plan choice changes immediately
after a VACUUM of the table.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: