Re: Bug in tm2timestamp

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Another point worth considering is that most of this is duplicated by
>> ecpg's libpgtypes.

> Bah, ignore this.

Huh?  I think you're quite right that it'd be a good idea to get rid of
the duplicated code, if we could.  It's always been the backend's free
reliance on palloc and elog/ereport that's been stopping that.  I think
we might now have a realistic solution for palloc, but what about elog?
        regards, tom lane