Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from the
> spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed from
> the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It didn't
> seem right to include the 7.4 jdbc jars in the 8.0 source rpm, and I
> wasn't sure where to get the equivalent of 8.0.0beta1 jdbc jar files (if
> such a thing even exists).

What I've done so far is just to grab the latest stable release from
jdbc.postgresql.org.  Using jars as part of the SRPM is pretty ugly,
I agree.  There are some other Red Hat folk who have promised to look
into getting JDBC built from source instead, but it's not high priority.

            regards, tom lane