Re: CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in spgdoinsert() isn't helpful
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in spgdoinsert() isn't helpful |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16812.1401396097@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in spgdoinsert() isn't helpful (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> On 05/29/2014 11:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In point of fact, we'd be happy to give up the locks and then throw
>> the error. So I was thinking about inventing some macro or out-of-line
>> function that went about like this:
>>
>> if (InterruptPending && (QueryCancelPending || ProcDiePending))
>> {
>> LWLockReleaseAll();
>> ProcessInterrupts();
>> elog(ERROR, "ProcessInterrupts failed to throw an error");
>> }
> Also checking that CritSectionCount == 0 seems like a good idea...
Yeah, and there may be a couple other details like that. Right now
I'm just thinking about not allowing LWLocks to block the cancel.
I guess something else to consider is whether InterruptHoldoffCount
could be larger than the number of held LWLocks; if so, that would
prevent this from working as desired.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: