Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16812.1033700829@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? (Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au> writes:
> When talking of near-current systems with 64 bit off_t you are not
> going to find one without support for 64 bit integral types.
I tend to agree with Giles on this point. A non-integral representation
of off_t is theoretically possible but I don't believe it exists in
practice. Before going far out of our way to allow it, we should first
require some evidence that it's needed on a supported or
likely-to-be-supported platform.
time_t isn't guaranteed to be an integral type either if you read the
oldest docs about it ... but no one believes that in practice ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: