Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT

Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> Solution.pm has this:

> #if (_MSC_VER > 1200)
> #define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 1
> #define ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY 1
> #endif

> from which HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT seems to be suspiciously missing?

I remember noticing that discrepancy recently when I was chasing something
else about int64 support.  It certainly looks wrong, but not being much of
an ecpg user I was hesitant to touch it.

            regards, tom lane