Re: index being ignored for "limit n" queries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: index being ignored for "limit n" queries
Дата
Msg-id 16746.1123603412@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на index being ignored for "limit n" queries  (Piotr Sulecki <Piotr.Sulecki@sybilla.traxelektronik.pl>)
Ответы Re: index being ignored for "limit n" queries  (Piotr Sulecki <Piotr.Sulecki@sybilla.traxelektronik.pl>)
Список pgsql-general
Piotr Sulecki <Piotr.Sulecki@sybilla.traxelektronik.pl> writes:
> I have two really big tables, the problem is with one of them. The table
> looks as follows:
> ...
> Indexes:
>     "pakiety_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (pktid)
>     "pakiety_stid_received_idx" UNIQUE, btree (stid, received)
>     "pakiety_measured_idx" btree (measured)
>     "pakiety_received_idx" btree (received)
>     "pakiety_stid_measured_idx" btree (stid, measured)

> trax=# explain select * from pakiety where stid = 234::smallint order by
> received desc limit 1;

The reason this won't use the (stid, received) index is that the
requested sort order doesn't match that index.  Try

select * from pakiety where stid = 234::smallint
order by stid desc, received desc
limit 1;

There is code in CVS tip to recognize that the equality constraint on
stid allows the index to be considered as producing data ordered by
received alone --- but no released version will make that deduction
for you.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reference new.* or old.* in dynamic statement?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres & server encodings