ODBC Rewrite

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От markw@mohawksoft.com
Тема ODBC Rewrite
Дата
Msg-id 16716.24.91.171.78.1102428945.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: ODBC Rewrite  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: ODBC Rewrite  (Eric E <whalesuit@bonbon.net>)
Список pgsql-odbc
I have been thinking about the ODBC driver, I know you guys know a lot
more about it than I do, but I gather that the problem with it is that it
does not rely on the core PostgreSQL libraries. Which means that it needs
a lot of work when the PostgreSQL project makes a protocol change.

Looking at both ODBC and libpq and I think that the difference is that
libpq aims to make PostgreSQL interfacing easy, while ODBC strives to be a
comprehensive SQL interface. 99% of what will be done with the ODBC
interface will be simple SQLAllocStmt, SQLPrepare, and SQLExecute.

This difference, I think anyways, makes the libpq API a poor choice for
the foundation of the ODBC driver.

What is needed is a lower level PostgreSQL interface library. Maybe it is
based on libpq, making internal routines public, maybe it is a new
development, either way, I think both ODBC and HACKERS should cooperate on
a low level interface on which the ODBC driver can be based.

I also think with a solid defined project with a tangible outcome will be
more attrictive to new developers than does being a bugbitch.

What do you think?

В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: calling nextval function
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ODBC Rewrite