> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> First line of thought: we surely must not insert a snprintf into
>>> libpq.so unless it is 100% up to spec *and* has no performance issues
>>> ... neither of which can be claimed of the CVS-tip version.
>
>> Agreed, and we have to support all the 64-bit specifications a port
>> might support like %qd and %I64d as well as %lld. I have added that to
>> our current CVS version.
>
> I really dislike that idea and request that you revert it.
>
>> Is there any way we can have just gettext() call our snprintf under a
>> special name?
>
> The issue only comes up in libpq --- in the backend there is no reason
> that snprintf can't be our snprintf, and likewise in self-contained
> programs like psql. It might be worth the pain-in-the-neck quality to
> have libpq refer to the functions as pq_snprintf etc. Perhaps we could
> do this via macros
>
> #define snprintf pq_snprintf
Didn't I suggest that earlier? :) Also, since it is vsnprintf that seems
to be a bigger issue:
#define vsnprintf pq_vsnprintf