Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
Дата
Msg-id 1667.979063255@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can this now be marked as done?
> * Modification  of  pg_class  can  happen while table in use by  another
> backend.  Might  lead  to  MVCC  inside  of  syscache

I'm not sure.  Do you have any record of what the concern was, in
detail?  I don't understand what the TODO item is trying to say.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Quite strange crash
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now