Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1666832.1622067703@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Looks good to me.
> I tested the behavior with partitioned tables and it seems OK.
Thanks for reviewing/testing!
> It would be good to have a test case in src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl
> for the case
Personally I won't touch 002_pg_dump.pl with a 10-foot pole, but if
somebody else wants to, have at it.
> ... and I find it odd that we don't seem to have anything
> for the "CREATE TABLE foo (LIKE sometab INCLUDING stuff)" form of the
> command ... but neither of those seem the fault of this patch, and they
> both work as [I think] is intended.
Hm, there's this in compression.sql:
-- test LIKE INCLUDING COMPRESSION
CREATE TABLE cmdata2 (LIKE cmdata1 INCLUDING COMPRESSION);
\d+ cmdata2
Or did you mean the case with a partitioned table specifically?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: