Re: [PATCH][Documination] Add optional USING keyword before opclass name in INSERT statemet
От | Nikolay Shaplov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH][Documination] Add optional USING keyword before opclass name in INSERT statemet |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16646180.a69D9Aee7y@home обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH][Documination] Add optional USING keyword before opclass name in INSERT statemet (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH][Documination] Add optional USING keyword before
opclass name in INSERT statemet
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
В письме от 31 мая 2016 15:38:38 пользователь Robert Haas написал: > >>> 99% of the time, you'd be right. But this is an unusual case, for the > >>> reasons I mentioned before. > >> > >> I tend to agree with Nikolay. I can't see much upside in making this > >> change. At best, nothing will break. At worst, something will break. > >> But how do we actually come out ahead? > > > > We come out ahead by not having to make the documentation more confusing. > > > > Basically, we have the opportunity to fix an ancient mistake here at > > very low cost. I do not think that doubling down on the mistake is > > a better answer. > > I'm not convinced, but we don't have to agree on everything... I am not convinced too. But I will not argue hard for the patch as far as my main goal was to report inconsistency. Through the I consider Tom's proposal quite strange...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: