Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16595.1193723642@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes: > Sure - it's here: > http://momjian.us/mhonarc/patches_hold/msg00381.html Luke, this is not a patch, and I'm getting pretty dang tired of seeing you refer to it as one. What this is is a very-selective extract from Greenplum proprietary code. If you'd like us to think it is a patch, you need to offer the source code to all the GP-specific functions that are called in the quoted additions. Hell, the diff is *against* GP-specific code --- it removes calls to functions that we've never seen, eg here: - /* Use constant expr if available. Will be at head of list. */ - if (CdbPathkeyEqualsConstant(pathkey)) This is not a patch, and your statements that it's only a minor porting matter to turn it into one are lie^H^H^Hnonsense. Please lift the skirts higher than the ankle region if you want us to get excited. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: