Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16529.1562638933@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:19 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Given the purposes of this test, I think it'd be reasonable to force
>> both enable_hashjoin = on and enable_mergejoin = off at the very top
>> of the join_hash script, or the corresponding place in join.sql in
>> v11. Thomas, was there a specific reason for forcing enable_mergejoin
>> = off for only some of these tests?
> Based on a suggestion from Andres (if I recall correctly), I wrapped
> each individual test in savepoint/rollback, and then set just the GUCs
> needed to get the plan shape and execution code path I wanted to
> exercise, and I guess I found that I only needed to disable merge
> joins for some of them. The idea was that the individual tests could
> be understood independently.
But per this discussion, they can only be "understood independently"
if you make some assumptions about the prevailing values of the
planner GUCs.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: