Re: Really out of memory?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Really out of memory? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16518.1243968343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Really out of memory? (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Really out of memory?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com> writes:
> May 31 02:59:40 sfmelwss postgres[30103]: [1-1] ERROR: out of memory
> May 31 02:59:40 sfmelwss postgres[30103]: [1-2] DETAIL: Failed on request of size 16777212.
So the kernel isn't letting PG have any more memory.
> That seems pretty self-explainitory. But I'm not so sure, because SAR
> says:
> ...
> ...which indicates there was still plenty of space left in swap.
Which the kernel isn't letting us use. Check the "ulimit" settings
that the postmaster is being started with. On a Linux box, any of
the -d -m or -v settings might cause this.
It's possible you are running out of 32-bit address space in the backend
process, but what seems more likely is that the per-process ulimit is
unreasonably small.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: