> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> > Please see my posting about using a macro for snprintf. If the
>> current
>> > implementation of snprintf is enough for our existing translation
>> users
>> > we probably don't need to add anything more to it because snprintf
>> will
>> > not be exported to client applications.
>>
>> The CVS-tip implementation is fundamentally broken and won't work even
>> for our internal uses. I've not wasted time complaining about it
>> because I thought we were going to replace it. If we can't find a
>> usable replacement then we're going to have to put a lot of effort
>> into fixing what's there. On the whole I think the effort would be
>> better spent importing someone else's solution.
>
> Oh, so our existing implementation doesn't even meet our needs. OK.
Wasn't the issue about odd behavior of the Win32 linker choosing the wrong
vnsprintf?