Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Дата
Msg-id 164474.1623652853@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> Why do you think we don't need to check index AM functions?

Primarily because index AMs and opclasses can only be defined by
superusers, and the superuser is assumed to know what she's doing.

More generally, we've never made any provisions for the properties
of index AMs or opclasses to change on-the-fly.  I doubt that doing
so could possibly be justified on a cost-benefit basis.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Avoid stuck of pbgench due to skipped transactions