Re: updated emacs configuration
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: updated emacs configuration |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16407.1372384485@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: updated emacs configuration (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: updated emacs configuration
Re: updated emacs configuration |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Should we be using entab -s 3?
IIUC, that wouldn't affect leading whitespace at all. What it would
affect I think (outside of comment blocks) is whitespace between code
and a same-line /* ... */ comment. Personally I'd prefer that a
tab-stop-aligned /* ... */ comment always have a tab before it, even
if the expansion of the tab is only *one* space. That is, in
foo(bar, /* comment */ bar1, /* comment */ bar12, /* comment */ bar123, /* comment */
baz); /* comment */
I think each of those comments ought to have a tab before it, not
space(s). pgindent currently does this inconsistently --- the bar123
line will have a space instead. Moving to -s 3 would presumably make
this worse (even less consistent) not better, since now the bar12 line
would also be emitted with spaces not a tab.
Inside a comment, though, probably the behavior of -s 3 would be just
fine. So the real problem here IMO is that use of tabs ought to be
context sensitive (behavior inside a comment different from outside),
and I don't think entab can do that. I see though that it understands
about C quoted strings, so maybe we could teach it about comments too?
No idea whether astyle is any smarter about this.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: