Re: REVIEW: ALTER TABLE ... ADD FOREIGN KEY ... NOT ENFORCED

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 20:33 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> \d table now only shows that there's a FOREIGN KEY, which might lead the 
>> user to think that there should not be any values that don't exist in 
>> the referenced table.

> Neither \d nor \di shows invalid indexes.

Even if that were true, it's a poor analogy, since a disabled foreign
key has visible *semantic* impact, whereas a disabled index doesn't.
        regards, tom lane