Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16374.1281026184@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ago 05 11:06:57 -0400 2010:
>> 1. Write the dirty buffers before dropping them. Kind of ugly from a
>> performance viewpoint, but simple and safe.
> I think "simple" is good, considering that this code is gone in 9.0 and
> HEAD. IMHO investing too much effort on this problem is not worth it.
Gone? Looks like it's still there to me.
> Perhaps it'd be good to come up with a better solution for HEAD:
Yeah, the panic-on-replay aspect is troublesome. I feel like we need a
rethink here. But I agree that solution #1 is the only one that feels
safe enough for backpatching.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: