Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 163638.1756650883@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1
Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: > On 30.08.25 18:52, Tom Lane wrote: >> I suppose that the expectation is that every release note item >> will be credited to someone. Why does this item lack a credit? > Maybe I'm understanding this differently, but the "Migration" section > ought to be advice about the migration, which is not a place to > communicate credit. In the case I added, the item is the result of some > changes that are already listed and credited elsewhere in the "Changes" > section. One answer could be to remove the commit-details comment block from that item, thereby making the added URL go away too. However, that will look a bit odd when the neighboring items all have credits and URLs. I think our past practice has been to list any one item either in Migration or the following sections, not in both places. This item seems to adhere to that too: I don't see that commit hash anywhere else. So I'm not clear why you're finding this duplicative? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: