Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 16:14, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm not really insisting on a redesign. �I'm talking about the places
>> where the code author appears not to have understood that ERROR means
>> FATAL, because the code keeps plugging on after it anyway. �As far as
>> I can see, using ERROR at lines 3630, 3657, 3674, and 3693 is just
>> plain bogus, and changing to LOG there requires no other fixing.
> But. I'll look into cleaning those up for HEAD anyway, but due to lack
> of reports I think we should skip backpatch. Reasonable?
Fair enough.
regards, tom lane