Re: RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support

That would be me.

Lots more work to be done on domains yet though (foreign keys, check
constraints, etc.), but those will have to come in some other weekend.

I think you'll really enjoy my next patch (should be submitted soon).
If it goes through it'll make your life quite a bit easier -- then
again, maybe not.

--
Rod Taylor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "'Rod Taylor'" <rbt@zort.ca>; <pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: "'Frank_Lupo'" <frank_lupo@email.it>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support


> BTW Rod, I forgot to mention, thanks for the Domain support in 7.3
(I assume
> you're the only Rod Taylor around here). A nice feature - I'm just
finishing
> adding support to pgAdmin...
>
> Note to Frank Lupo: Domains implement what the patch to pgAdmin that
you
> sent me did, only in PostgreSQL itself. Not particuarly obvious from
the
> name though :-(
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk]
> > Sent: 05 April 2002 15:44
> > To: 'Rod Taylor'; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rod Taylor [mailto:rbt@zort.ca]
> > > Sent: 05 April 2002 15:34
> > > To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support
> > >
> > >
> > > Option 2 is certainly the best long term.  A couple of
> > > releases from now and very few people will be using 7.2 or
> > > prior -- and they should expect newer tools to be broken .
> > >
> > > Support namespaces in the cleanest way possible, and
> > > potentially add a temporary hack (for the length of 7.3.x
> > > releases and maybe part of
> > > 7.4) to support 7.2 and prior with a 'pg_public' or default
> > > namespace. ie.  Pretend a namespace exists for public stuff,
> > > as when they upgrade to 7.3 that would be where it all ends
> > > up (I think), so it's somwhat appropriate.
> >
> > It sounds so obvious - I'm gutted I didn't think of that myself
:-).
> >
> > Thanks Rod.
> >
> > Dave.
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>