Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Дата
Msg-id 16296.1201485843@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  ("Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>)
Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
[ redirecting thread to -hackers ]

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.

> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> "synchronized_seqscans"?

We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: SSL connections don't cope with server crash very well at all
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names