Re: Review: listagg aggregate

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Дата
Msg-id 162867791001250234jff7765du9ab7ddb3f3d8f53a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Review: listagg aggregate  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Review: listagg aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> On sön, 2010-01-24 at 21:29 -0800, Scott Bailey wrote:
>> I think listagg or string_agg would be the most appropriate names. Oh
>> and before Oracle had wm_concat, Tom Kyte wrote a function called
>> stragg that was pretty popular.
>
> Well,
>
> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>
> So it's pretty clear that listagg does not fit into this scheme.

when you define list as text domain, then this the name is correct.

searching "list sql string" on google. You can see, so "list" is usually used.

Regards
Pavel

>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_listener entries deleted under heavy NOTIFY load only on Windows