Re: patch: Review handling of MOVE and FETCH (ToDo)

2009/9/28 John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>:
> Pavel,
>
> It looks good. My last email didn't go to -hackers, since I wasn't
> subscribed. I had to resend to -hackers so there will be a link for
> the commitfest page. I think you might have to resend your latest
> patch to the list. Sorry!

nothing, patch attached

Pavel

>
> In any case, I will say it's ready for commiter.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I am sending actualised patch as per John comment.
>>
>> regards
>> Pavel Stehule
>>
>> 2009/9/26 John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I didn't notice the attachment on Pavel's email, otherwise I
>>> would have done this sooner! :)
>>>
>>> I just applied and tested the new patch. Everything works great.
>>>
>>> The only thing I would change now is some of the comments.
>>>
>>> 1). On line 289, one of the regression test comments got copied:
>>>
>>> +   move forward in c;                --should be at '5'
>>>
>>> change to:
>>>
>>> +   move forward in c;                --should be at '1'
>>>
>>> 2). Lines 79/80:
>>>
>>> +                                                                        errmsg("statement FETCH returns more
rows."),
>>> +                                                                        errhint("Multirows fetch are not allowed
inPL/pgSQL."))); 
>>>
>>> This might sound better as "statement FETCH returns multiple rows.",
>>> and "Multirow FETCH is not allowed in PL/pgSQL."
>>>
>>> Everything else looks good to me.
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Selena and John,
>>>>
>>>> Pavel's latest patch seems to address all the issues you raised in
>>>> your initial review.  Do you have any comments on this new revision?
>>>> If you're happy that your issues have been resolved, please mark the
>>>> patch as Ready for Committer.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> BJ
>>>>
>>>
>>
>