2009/8/9 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Oh, another thing: the present restriction that all function parameters
> after the first one with a default must also have defaults is based on
> limitations of positional call notation. Does it make sense to relax
> that restriction once we allow named call notation, and if so what
> should we do exactly? (This could be addressed in a followup patch,
> it doesn't necessarily have to be dealt with immediately.)
>
Yes, this rule should be useless. But with the remove of this rule, we
have to modify algorithm for positional notation. It depends on this
rule.
regards
Pavel Stehule
> regards, tom lane
>