2008/11/30 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> On Thursday 27 November 2008 00:14:19 Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> I am sending actualized versions - I accepted Tom's comments - default
>> expressions are serialised List stored in text field.
>
> OK, this is looking pretty good.
>
> There is a structural problem that we need to address. With your patch,
> pg_dump produces something like this:
>
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a integer = 1, b integer = 2, c integer = 3) RETURNS
> integer
> LANGUAGE sql
> AS $_$ SELECT $1 + $2 + $3; $_$;
>
> ALTER FUNCTION public.foo(a integer = 1, b integer = 2, c integer = 3) OWNER
> TO peter;
>
>
> The second command is rejected because default values are only accepted in
> CREATE FUNCTION.
>
> There are two ways to fix this, both having some validity:
>
> 1. We create a second version of pg_get_function_arguments() that produces
> arguments without default values decoration. This is probably the
> technically sound thing to do.
>
> 2. We accept the default values specification and ignore it silently. Note
> that we already silently ignore the argument names. ALTER FUNCTION foo(a
> int, b int) will also act on a function defined as foo(x int, y int).
>
if this variant is possible, then will be simply implemented
regard
Pavel
> Comments?
>