2007/9/4, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> > 2007/9/4, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> >> Yeah, good point. So far it seems that a-z 0-9 and underscore cover the
> >> real use-cases, so what say we just allow those for now? It's a lot
> >> easier to loosen up later than tighten up ...
>
> > It's system specific. I prefere a-z and A-Z. Clasic name for
> > dictionaries combine lower and upper characters .. for czech
> > cs_CZ_UTF8 etc.
>
> You're going to need to alter that habit anyway, because it's not
> appropriate to mention any specific encoding in the dictionary name.
>
> But on further thought it strikes me that insisting on all lower case
> doesn't eliminate case-sensitivity portability problems. For instance,
> suppose the given parameter is 'foo' and the actual file name is
> Foo.dict. This will work fine on Windows and will stop working when
> moved to Unix. So I'm not sure we really buy much by rejecting
> upper-case letters in the parameter --- all we do is constrain which
> side of the fence you have to fix any mismatches on. And we picked the
> side that only a DBA, rather than a plain SQL user, can fix.
>
ok. I can understand it. But I don't see sense of quoting of params
Regards
Pavel Stehule