Re: plperl vs. bytea

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: plperl vs. bytea
Дата
Msg-id 162867790705062238x54a895bx2412ac1678384d61@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl vs. bytea  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> What we've basically got here is a complaint that the default
> textual-representation-based method for transmitting PL function
> parameters and results is awkward and inefficient for bytea.
> So the first question is whether this is really localized to only
> bytea, and if not which other types have got similar issues.
> (Even if you make the case that no other scalar types need help,
> what of bytea[] and composite types containing bytea or bytea[]?)
>

It can be solution for known isues. Current textual representation is
more ugly hack than everythink else.

Regards
Pavel Stehule


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum does not start in HEAD
Следующее
От: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Дата:
Сообщение: Stats not updated after rollback -- autovacuum confused.