Re: pg_regress: paths in largeobject test
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_regress: paths in largeobject test |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1628.1196434400@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_regress: paths in largeobject test (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_regress: paths in largeobject test
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'd put it the other way around: likely we should get rid of the
>>> one use of @abs_builddir@.
>>
>> Generally I prefer explicit over implicit (having the full paths make
>> troubleshooting easier), but in this case you have the additional aspect of
>> the lo_import operating relative to the client, while lo_export operates
>> relative to the server.
> I submit that the test is OK as it currently is.
Yeah, I hadn't thought about the different-paths aspect at the time of
making the above comment; but given that, it is correct as-is.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: